Difference between revisions of "CSE550 Combinatorial Algorithms/Intractability"

From esoterum.org
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
*[http://ad.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/lehre/ss01/paa/vorlesung-uebungen/download/index.htm Lectures from the University of Freiburg]
 
*[http://ad.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/lehre/ss01/paa/vorlesung-uebungen/download/index.htm Lectures from the University of Freiburg]
 
*> [http://www.ensta.fr/~diam/ro/online/viggo_wwwcompendium/node276.html List of NP-Hard problems]
 
*> [http://www.ensta.fr/~diam/ro/online/viggo_wwwcompendium/node276.html List of NP-Hard problems]
 +
*> [http://www2.toki.or.id/book/AlgDesignManual/INDEX.HTM ''The Algorithm Design Manual''], Steven S. Skiena, Department of Computer Science State University of New York (Online)
 +
  
 
== HW 6 ==
 
== HW 6 ==

Revision as of 12:13, 30 November 2007

Resources

-Unimodularity ensures that the solution to an LP will always be integer if all of the costs and constraints are also integer


HW 6

1. 2-SAT is in NP
2. A sub-optimal solution to TSP is a Hamiltonian Cycle.
3. 3SAT reduction to NAESAT
4. Finding disjoint paths with different path-costs: Complexity and algorithms

HW 7

1.
-Theorem 1.2 (Kumar and Li, 2002) Any asymmetric TSP on n locations can be reducedto a symmetric TSP on 2n locations

Midterm

Q1

Q4

Final

Q2

Project

2. Linear program formulation and solving. You can examine one or more linear programming formulations for a speci�c problem. This should be done by using a free solver, such as GLPK and a modeling language such as AMPL or the subset of AMPL that comes with GLPK. (If you have access to CPLEX and/or real AMPL, that is also perfectly fine with me.) Your goal in this might be to examine and compare the solution times for several formulations of a problem (as in the mincut example), or to study the tightness of a relaxation (as in the case of Steiner trees and edge coloring). Some suggestions for this type of project:

-Comparing minimum cut formulations (standard cut covering, polynomial-size directed flow formulation, compact formulation by Carr et al.).
-Bidirected formulation for the Steiner tree problem (Rajagopalan-Vazirani).
-Asymmetric TSP (Charikar, Goemans, Karloff).
-Matching-based LP relaxation of edge-coloring gap should be an additive 1! There is a paper by Jeff Kahn, but it is somewhat difficult.
-Chapter 7. LP in Practice
-> Chapter 10. Network Flow Programming