Difference between revisions of "Global Climate Change"
From esoterum.org
(→Research) |
(→Research) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*[http://cdiac.ornl.gov/pns/faq.html Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory resource on understanding climate data] | *[http://cdiac.ornl.gov/pns/faq.html Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory resource on understanding climate data] | ||
:-If CO2 came from the atmosphere to begin with then there is no net effect | :-If CO2 came from the atmosphere to begin with then there is no net effect | ||
| − | :-Humans breath out approximately 1kg of CO2 per day, (~6 | + | :-Humans breath out approximately 1kg of CO2 per day, (~6,000,000,000kg/day) |
=== [[Climate science non-debate | Non-existant Debate]] === | === [[Climate science non-debate | Non-existant Debate]] === | ||
Revision as of 11:28, 15 June 2010
Contents
Resources
Forests and Global Climate
- Steven Milloy. Temperate Forests Warm the Planet, Scientists Report. Environment & Climate News, The Heartland Institute. June 2007.
- Matt Power. Old-Growth Forests Can Actually Contribute to Global Warming. Wired Magazine: 16.06. May 19, 2008.
Global Cooling?
- Global Cooling, Not Warming, Is the Problem. Western Institute for Study of the Environment Commentary Home. 23 Feb 2010, 10:44am
How to conclude a scientific debate (an observation of the end of debate on climate change)
- Declare skeptics of your theory wrong
- Declare skeptics of your theory irrelevant
- Declare the debate over
Research
- -If CO2 came from the atmosphere to begin with then there is no net effect
- -Humans breath out approximately 1kg of CO2 per day, (~6,000,000,000kg/day)
