Difference between revisions of "CSE550 Combinatorial Algorithms/Intractability"

From esoterum.org
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
*[http://www.cs.princeton.edu/introcs/77intractability/ Good article on intractability from Princeton]
 
*[http://www.cs.princeton.edu/introcs/77intractability/ Good article on intractability from Princeton]
 
*David S. Johnson, [http://www.research.att.com/~dsj/columns/col10.pdf "The NP-Completeness Column: An Ongoing Guide"], J. Algorithms 5, 147-160 (1984)
 
*David S. Johnson, [http://www.research.att.com/~dsj/columns/col10.pdf "The NP-Completeness Column: An Ongoing Guide"], J. Algorithms 5, 147-160 (1984)
 +
*> Alexander Schrijver, [http://homepages.cwi.nl/~lex/files/histco.pdf "On the history of combinatorial optimization (till 1960)"]
  
  

Revision as of 15:06, 1 December 2007

Resources

-Unimodularity ensures that the solution to an LP will always be integer if all of the costs and constraints are also integer


HW 6

1. 2-SAT is in NP
2. A sub-optimal solution to TSP is a Hamiltonian Cycle.
3. 3SAT reduction to NAESAT
4. Finding disjoint paths with different path-costs: Complexity and algorithms

HW 7

1.
-Theorem 1.2 (Kumar and Li, 2002) Any asymmetric TSP on n locations can be reducedto a symmetric TSP on 2n locations

Midterm

Q1

Q4

Final

Q2

Q2

Q5

Project

2. Linear program formulation and solving. You can examine one or more linear programming formulations for a speci�c problem. This should be done by using a free solver, such as GLPK and a modeling language such as AMPL or the subset of AMPL that comes with GLPK. (If you have access to CPLEX and/or real AMPL, that is also perfectly fine with me.) Your goal in this might be to examine and compare the solution times for several formulations of a problem (as in the mincut example), or to study the tightness of a relaxation (as in the case of Steiner trees and edge coloring). Some suggestions for this type of project:

-Comparing minimum cut formulations (standard cut covering, polynomial-size directed flow formulation, compact formulation by Carr et al.).
-Bidirected formulation for the Steiner tree problem (Rajagopalan-Vazirani).
-Asymmetric TSP (Charikar, Goemans, Karloff).
-Matching-based LP relaxation of edge-coloring gap should be an additive 1! There is a paper by Jeff Kahn, but it is somewhat difficult.
-Chapter 7. LP in Practice
-> Chapter 10. Network Flow Programming