Difference between revisions of "Global Climate Change"
From esoterum.org
(→Forests and Global Climate) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*[http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ realclimate.org], raw data | *[http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ realclimate.org], raw data | ||
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKoUwttE0BA&feature=related Henrik Svenmark's work on the relationship between cosmic rays and clouds] | *[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKoUwttE0BA&feature=related Henrik Svenmark's work on the relationship between cosmic rays and clouds] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Sensitivity == | ||
+ | *The Economist. [http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21574461-climate-may-be-heating-up-less-response-greenhouse-gas-emissions A Sensitive Matter]. March 30, 2013. Response not as expected | ||
== Forests and Global Climate == | == Forests and Global Climate == |
Latest revision as of 08:33, 21 January 2017
Contents
Resources
- -If CO2 came from the atmosphere to begin with then there is no net effect
- -Humans breath out approximately 1kg of CO2 per day, (~6,000,000,000kg/day)
Sensitivity
- The Economist. A Sensitive Matter. March 30, 2013. Response not as expected
Forests and Global Climate
- Steven Milloy. Temperate Forests Warm the Planet, Scientists Report. Environment & Climate News, The Heartland Institute. June 2007.
- Matt Power. Old-Growth Forests Can Actually Contribute to Global Warming. Wired Magazine: 16.06. May 19, 2008.
Global Cooling?
- Global Cooling, Not Warming, Is the Problem. Western Institute for Study of the Environment Commentary Home. 23 Feb 2010, 10:44am
How to conclude a scientific debate (an observation of the end of debate on climate change)
- Declare skeptics of your theory wrong
- Declare skeptics of your theory irrelevant
- Declare the debate over